The perceived calm in Indonesia, marked by a reduction in major terror attacks, is a deceptive peace. As of May 2025, terrorism has undergone a profound metamorphosis, shifting from physical battlefields to the subtle yet pervasive realm of cyberspace. This fifth wave of extremism is increasingly targeting the nation's youth, exploiting their hyper-connectivity and the very platforms that define their digital lives. Extremist groups, once reliant on training camps and physical safe houses, now require only internet access and a compelling narrative. What began as simple propaganda on satellite television has evolved into sophisticated recruitment campaigns across social media giants like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter, and extending to encrypted platforms. This digital transformation allows for rapid dissemination of radical ideologies, bypassing traditional information filters and critical scrutiny, making young people particularly vulnerable.
The alarming reality is reflected in 2023 data from Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (Indonesia's National Counterterrorism Agency, BNPT), revealing that 96.9% of terrorism-related arrests involved individuals of productive age (18–55 years old), with a significant 11.9% falling within the young adult bracket of 18–27 years old. The insidious nature of this online threat is further underscored by recent events, such as the arrest of an 18-year-old in South Sulawesi, who was actively spreading ISIS propaganda and inciting bombings through a WhatsApp group he managed since December 2024. Globally, the chilling case of Jaswant Singh Chail, who attempted to assassinate Queen Elizabeth II after being radicalized by an AI chatbot he created, serves as a stark warning of the personal, algorithm-driven, and humanless frontier of extremism facilitated by artificial intelligence. This phenomenon aligns with Professor Petrus Golose's 9P Theory, illustrating how every aspect of terror-related activity, from recruitment and financing to planning and execution, is now deeply embedded in cyberspace. Furthermore, the dark web provides an anonymous ecosystem for illicit transactions, complicating law enforcement efforts.
The implications for Indonesia are far-reaching, affecting its legal frameworks, counter-terrorism industry, and overall governance. The existing Law No. 5 of 2018 on Counter-Terrorism, while emphasizing prevention and deradicalization, faces immense pressure to adapt to the rapid technological advancements in cyberterrorism. The surge in radical online content, with over 180,000 cases handled by authorities in 2024, demonstrates the sheer scale of the challenge. This digital shift necessitates a fundamental re-evaluation of how Indonesia's counter-terrorism agencies, including BNPT and Densus 88, operate, demanding greater investment in digital forensics, AI-driven detection systems, and the development of sophisticated online counter-narratives to combat the subtle infiltration of ideas. The government also faces the challenge of engaging with tech giants to ensure cooperation without infringing on civil liberties.
Despite these challenges, BNPT is actively pursuing a balanced approach, combining hard and soft measures, and has engaged in various initiatives to counter online extremism, including Media and Information Literacy (MIL) workshops with university students and collaborations with international partners like Hedayah and Europol to strengthen digital literacy and develop innovative counter-narrative campaigns. Indonesia has also issued Presidential Regulation Number 7 of 2021 on the 2020-2024 National Action Plan for Preventing and Overcoming Violent Extremism that Leads to Terrorism, prioritizing a soft approach that involves government and public participation.
Nevertheless, some observers worry that despite advancements in countering terrorism online, the tech industry itself poses inherent difficulties. The rapid development of social media platforms and encryption methods often outpaces legal frameworks, hindering the ability of authorities to effectively monitor and dismantle extremist networks. There are also arguments that the emphasis placed by tech companies on user privacy can inadvertently create safe havens for radical elements, making vital intelligence gathering more challenging. This ongoing tension between privacy concerns and national security remains a significant concern within the industry.
Sources:
CYBERSECURITY
June 5, 2025
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.